To clarify - these are definitions of each as per a 2004 CAPS Research study by Fraser Johnson and Michiel Leenders:
Centralized Structure—All main purchasing is controlled at one central location for the entire firm.
Hybrid Structure—Purchasing is shared between the corporate office and the business units, operating plants, and/or divisions.
Decentralized Structure—All main purchasing is controlled at the business units, plants, and/or divisions.
That being said, research doesn't necessarily show whether people 'choose' a hybrid solution or if it is just a stage in a process of business transformation. A hybrid structure is less of a change than moving directly from centralized to decentralized and vice versa. According to Johnson/Leenders, the organizations in the hybrid structure in their 1995 study had since moved to either centralized or decentralized structures.
When considering a change, the study found that:
- Major changes in supply organization structure are driven by factors external to the supply organization itself, such as organizational structure as a whole changes; political pressures; competitive pressures; global issues; technology and continuous improvement which required adjustments on the supply chain structure to cope with the external pressures.
- Changes were not necessarily due to unsatisfactory performance of the function.
- Changes were due to attempts to improve cost structure “cost was cited as a universal driver for major corporate structural change.” (Leenders, pg 10)
-----------------------------
Johnson, P. Fraser and Leenders, Michiel R., Supply’s Organizational Roles and Responsibilities, The Centre for Advanced Purchasing Studies, 2004.
http://www.capsresearch.org/Publications/pdfs-protected/johnson2004.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment